Chicago

  1. NU alum “Engage”-ing Chicago with global health

    April 30, 2013 by Lyz Hoffman
    Courtesy of Christina Cole

    Courtesy of Christina Cole

    For Northwestern University alumna Christina Cole, graduating with a degree in global health (as well as political science) was not enough—she wanted to continue exploring it. Since last year, Cole has been a part of PIH Engage, an all-volunteer movement from Partners in Health spearheaded by Cole’s fellow alum and PIH’s community engagement coordinator, Jon Shaffer. Since the fall, PIH Engage has spanned to about 50 cities across the country, with local activists aiming to bring greater awareness to global health issues.

    Cole is one of those activists. Recently, she talked to the Global Health Portal about her work, what it means for Chicago, and what she’s enjoyed about it so far.

    How did you get involved in the local branch of PIH Engage?
    I originally became involved about a year ago in the beginnings of the program. The Chicago community was a pilot community. Before the program launched, Jon Shaffer gathered individuals he knew in Chicago to bounce ideas off of us. When the program launched in September, he had more defined roles evolved. I applied to be a community coordinator.

    How does the Chicago program work? Is it the city as a whole or multiple neighborhoods?
    Ideally we wanted to do multiple communities in Chicago. We realized that building a community of 25 people that came regularly was actually quite difficult. It’s a young professional movement. We meet once a month. The meeting locations vary, but we host them at houses, so there’s a little personal touch. I have a couple other community coordinators, who are all based in Chicago. I met them through this group. I didn’t know them before. Part of the movement is connecting like-minded people. I’ve become really good friends with them, which is nice.

    There are national goals for all of the Engage locations, right?
    There are national goals, but setting goals for our community was really important as well. It’s also about setting goals for yourself. One of our meetings was about that. Another meeting was about the story of self, about creating your story about why you’re connected to this movement and why are you here. Most community members said they had observations of inequity.

    What are the goals for the Chicago program?
    In order to be a community member, we’d like you to commit to an advocacy action and be able to fundraise. Our goal-setting meeting we established what we could personally give. We’re volunteering—this isn’t our job. It’s about really being honest with how much hours you could give, because all of this takes a long time. We’re trying to commit to at least one advocacy action per week. Fundraising, we left broad. Advocacy actions: In general, the term advocacy brought to mind more policy-minded actions, and it has developed from there into more awareness actions, such as sharing a TED talk on Facebook, having a conversation about an article with a friend, or tweeting at someone about a certain policy. It’s a really loose term. We wanted people to interpret it the best way they could.

    If you had to sum up PIH Engage, what would you say?
    It’s a movement to create passionate communities advocating and educating and fundraising around the right to health.

    What does community organizing mean to you?
    I think truly community organizing, for me it means more of like a grassroots movement to connect equally minded people. I definitely don’t see the downward side. For me it’s more about really creating these relationships with people. Aside from even PIH’s goals here, I’ve created such great friendships and insights into what’s going on in Chicago’s global health community. This has really been an eye-opening experience, seeing people who are 35 and still involved in global health and in what capacity. That’s been great.

    This program is all-volunteer, right? Does it intersect with your work?
    Everyone’s volunteering. I work at a large PR firm, doing healthcare PR. I work at Edelman and they have a community investment grant, which is an opportunity for Edelman to recognize the work their employees do outside of Edelman. I filled out the grant for PIH, talking about the work I did, and got almost $1,500. It’s really exciting. My worlds are kind of colliding.

    Why did you want to be a part of this?

    I think I was missing the piece of giving back. Connecting the people was missing for me. Getting on the ground and saying why you’re passionate about something. I have totally seen value in connecting with the people that I’ve met.

    Why is this an important thing to do, especially in Chicago?
    Something like this doesn’t really exist yet—a group where young professionals can talk about global health. I’ve been looking for this. There’s Northwestern, lots of medical schools, lots of students interested in global health, and a ton of medical students who want to be more involved. Global health is sort of a hot topic right now. We’ve seen a lot of interest.

    What has the response been so far? Any negatives? What are the positives?
    One negative aspect is just organizing people and realizing that we’re all volunteers and that comes with a lagged response sometimes, which can be really frustrating. It’s about balancing that and also communicating meetings well in advance. It’s all stuff that you have to give and take, because we are volunteers. But there are huge positives. Not only are we talking and communicating about global health, but we’re also finding that conversation starts. The group is constantly expanding. The more people hear about it, the more people want to get involved.

  2. Illinois sparking a refugee health care revolution

    December 19, 2012 by Jennifer-Leigh Oprihory

    (BY: JENNIFER-LEIGH OPRIHORY & KIRSTIN FAWCETT VIA MEDILL REPORTS – CHICAGO)

    SONY DSC

    Dr. Gary Kaufman, medical director of Touhy Health Center in Rogers Park, points out some of the homelands of refugees seeking screening and treatment at his center. (Photo Credit: Jennifer-Leigh Oprihory/MEDILL)

    A movement spreading across Illinois is creating a health care revolution for refugees from countries including Burma, Bhutan and Iraq.

    For them, a health care safety net is forming in small towns and big cities, alike, where health professionals with a passion for improving lives and refugees join forces.

    Refugees themselves – who often speak several languages – are joining clinic staff and lobbying for more health and social services. Patient navigators, including volunteers, help get people to appointments and explain use of medications. But the services, critical for many, may only be free for eight months and refugees and supporters are trying to identify alternative places for them to turn.

    Refugees such as Bashir, an Iraqi who suffers from hemophilia, find otherwise-unavailable health and social services from institutions passionate about healing body, mind and spirit. But he said his coverage will expire at the end of the year.

    Others, like Gawmu Pyaohn, a Burmese refugee who arrived in the United States on Halloween 2006, find eyes and ears willing to look past surface assumptions to determine accurate diagnoses. Though her son had a learning disability, his refugee status initially made others mistake his academic struggles for poor English skills, said Pyaohn through a translator.

    “In the school when he is studying, the teacher thinks it’s a problem because of language, but they did not appreciate the real situations of my son,” said Pyaohn, who noted that her child developed speech difficulties at age 11.

    It’s impossible to understand the movement unless you witness it from inside, says one of the chief proponents, Dr. Gary Kaufman, the medical director of Mt. Sinai’s Touhy Health Center in Rogers Park. That’s where we go.

    The view from the ground

    Kaufman gestures to a crowd of about 30 waiting patients standing in the lobby of Touhy Health Center. He introduces them in the manner of extended family, their names and points of origin tracing a map-shaped family tree.

    Kaufman explains the center’s history and significance with photos, anecdotes and references to the champions for refugee health: Dr. Edwin Silverman, who serves as Illinois’s State Refugee Director, and Dr. Norton Sokol, a former head of Touhy venerated for his contributions to the refugee community.

    When Kaufman fights for increased refugee health resources, he’s also fighting for these refugees and this history.

    Within the walls of Touhy, the push is personal for improved refugee healthcare and social services.

    Take Imad Al Dulaimi, for instance.

    The deaf Iraqi refugee, a patient of Kaufman’s, arrived in Illinois in 2010 with the help of the United Nations. Despite having no knowledge of American Sign Language, Al Dulaimi managed to work with Kaufman and a local refugee interpreter to bridge the communication gap. Since then, he’s found an apartment, learned how to use a video phone, continued his education and begun working with local deaf outreach efforts to pay the kindness forward.

    New country, new problems

    Refugees are individuals who request permission to enter the United States due to actual or feared persecution on the basis of “race, religion, nationality, membership in a specific social group or political opinion,” according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

    Their humanitarian urgency differentiates them from other immigrants. But the refugees’ journey doesn’t end once they’re stateside. Refugees face many health challenges – but the chief challenge is insurance coverage.

    Federal refugee medical assistance provides medical coverage lasts eight months for single adults and married couples without children. Families with dependent children are eligible for Medicaid and children get until age 19.

    The current eight-month cycle under refugee medical assistance came about in 1990, when the coverage period was shortened from 36 months.

    Dr. Megha Chadha, a Nigerian-born psychiatrist who works part-time at Touhy, lived in India before moving to the United States. Her multicultural experiences helps her empathize with patients, she said. This understanding transcends language boundaries and gives her a deeper understanding of needs, she said.

    “Seeing the contrasts, I think I can appreciate what it’s really like to be in those kind of countries,” Chadha said. “I think there’s a lot of people who don’t realize what it feels like to be a refugee.”

    “You take things like being part of a country, being a part of a community, for granted, and you don’t realize the importance of that,” continued Chadha. “I think that’s what’s different from refugee community than a regular person on the street…you don’t know what it feels like to just not belong anywhere.”

    Chadha said that one major difficulty in working with refugees is navigating cultural understandings of what conditions do – and don’t – warrant treatment.

    Some of her patients arrive with psychological conditions including post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. But a lack of education or health care in their own countries means that patients aren’t always aware they require treatment.

    Cultural perceptions of what’s considered normal and abnormal must be understood by medical practitioners because refugees “may or may not report those things,” Chadha said.

    Kaufman said some refugees hold an “if it doesn’t hurt, it can’t be a problem” philosophy. However, he said, while an American’s invisible problem might be something along the lines of high blood pressure, a refugee’s hidden condition might be more akin to hepatitis C.

    Kaufman listed two important obstacles facing refugee health: unemployment and childcare.

    “In many countries, a large family is a sign of prosperity, even if you’re poor,” Kaufman said. “One of my Somalis has 13 kids. About a third of them were born here.”

    But he said the burden of balancing health-related cost with everyday expenses (specifically, the need to choose between feeding one’s family and receiving medical care) is a refugees’ greatest health-related challenge.

    According to Amy Rowell, another health issue that refugees face is the shift from a survival-based lifestyle into a quality-of-life-based one in which long-needed treatments are no longer postponed.

    “If they’ve had a tooth that’s needed to be pulled for five years and then they get into the country, we’re going to need to get that extracted,” says Rowell, director of nonprofit World Relief’s Moline office. “When you’re a refugee in some places in the world, it’s for survival. It’s not about managing your health long-term.”

    World Relief assists in refugee resettlement, among other things.

    One of Rowell’s jobs is to serve as a point-person who brings the refugee health story to a wider audience to ease their transitions into American society. Rowell said her organization works towards improving this issue through patient navigation, education and interpretation.

    Kristine Sibounheuang, a nurse and clinical manager at the Winnebago County refugee and tuberculosis clinics says access to care, in general, is another huge issue.

    “Because there are so many barriers out there because of language, transportation, people who are here more than eight months— if they don’t have family, they lose their medical cards and they don’t have coverage,” she said. “And they don’t understand.”

    The fine print

    Three main groups comprise the majority of Illinois’ more recent refugee population: the Iraqis, Burmese and Bhutanese, Silverman said.

    According to data from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement, 1,941 refugees arrived in Illinois in 2011.

    Of these, 503 came from Bhutan, 568 came from Burma and 599 were from Iraq.

    “The Bhutanese and the Burmese have been in refugee camps for more than 10 years,” Silverman said.

    “The Iraqis who are coming have been so-called ‘urban refugees.’ They haven’t been in camps. They have been in mainly Jordan and Syria.”

    “The three groups have not had access to adequate healthcare for a number of years and so they are arriving with need for health assessment and healthcare,” he continued, noting that specific refugee health needs different between each community.

    Silverman, who has worked with Illinois’ state refugee program since January 1976, got his start when he was asked to help coordinate the Vietnamese refugee resettlement while working in the governor’s office.

    “I’ve been involved ever since,” he said.

    In terms of these newcomers’ health situations, all refugees coming to Chicago are required to have an initial health screening (otherwise known as a comprehensive refugee health screening assessment) at one of three state-funded providers within 90 days of arrival in the U.S, according to Illinois State Refugee Health Director Jenny Aguirre.

    Three screening providers cover Illinois and the Touhy Health Center is the only location in Chicago.

    These screening costs are covered by the state and Medicaid or refugee assistance cover subsequent treatment. However, various nonprofits and medical centers provide refugees various health and social services at low or no cost.

    According to Aguirre, 2,085 comprehensive refugee health screening assessments were provided in fiscal year 2011 – an 872-patient increase from fiscal year 2009. The number of screened patients was calculated as the number of provider reimbursements issued by the state each year.

    The outlook

    Despite the difficulties faced by refugee healthcare providers and refugee affairs administrators, their progress motivates plans for the future.

    “You develop a database of ways to assist the refugees,” says Kaufman about the way he and his center attempt to link refugees with various resources to improve their health and well-being, including referrals to specialists willing to provide low-cost (and, in rare instances, pro-bono) treatment.

    Another huge boon for the Touhy Health Center offers refugees is an on-site pharmacy where much of the medication is funded by state grants. Here, patients can receive medication-related information and instructions in their native languages.

    “I think the fact that we get more involved in their social situations,… in educating them, we get involved with helping them with things that they aren’t aware of, [that] they [refugees] don’t know that physicians… or social workers can do – I think that’s the biggest impact that we end up having on them,” Chadha says. “We may or may not be very effective, but we intervene at a global level, not just a medical level.”

    Nearly everyone interviewed agreed that increased translation, patient education and coverage, and funding would help improve the situation, as well.

    On the policy-level, a recent collaboration between Northwestern University, Access Living and local players within the refugee health movement resulted in the publication of a refugee-minded policy brief for healthcare and refugee leaders, policymakers and the general public alike.

    The brief focused on health and social service barriers that refugees face when entering the U.S. with preexisting disabilities and chronic health conditions. The document was distributed during a Refugee Town Hall meeting held at Access Living in Chicago. It provides an outline for recommendations for improvements to policy, practice and research dealing with disabled and chronically-ill refugees. Mansha Mirza, Ph.D. (associate professor of occupational therapy at the University of Illinois-Chicago) and Bhuttu Matthews (disability coordinator at Access Living) served as co-principal investigators on the project.

    Recurring themes included the need for increased coverage, improved data collection and communication between refugee screeners around the world. Other topics were increased patient education and translation, the implementation of culturally-sensitive mental health services and standardized health screening.

    While this briefing was aimed at a smaller group of refugees, its core values can be applied to serving the greater community. The initiative’s pairing with practitioners’ forward thinking sets the stage for a refugee-care revolution.

    And whether or not it’s televised, we’ll be watching.


    Graphic Credit: Jennifer-Leigh Oprihory

  3. The battle against malaria in Africa: A fight for a million kids’ lives

    November 16, 2012 by Jennifer-Leigh Oprihory

    (BY: JENNIFER-LEIGH OPRIHORY & CORINNE CHIN via MEDILL REPORTS-CHICAGO)

    Sprayers, like the one pictured here in Zanzibar, are crucial players in the war against malaria in Africa. (Photo Courtesy of USAID)

    Charles Llewellyn survived the frontlines of an ongoing war.

    Though the enemy is of microscopic proportions, total victory is yet to come.

    But Llewellyn warns that if global prevention efforts cease, malaria-carrying mosquitoes would surge to pre-intervention levels and that could cost the lives of a million African children each year. The former Foreign Health Service Officer spoke at Northwestern University on Wednesday about “Malaria and Public Health in Africa, Reflections on a Career with USAID.”

    “With the President’s Malaria Initiative, we had a political reaction to a terrible disease,” Llewellyn said. “A million African kids were dying every year from a preventable, treatable disease.”

    President George W. Bush launched the initiative in 2005.

    An entomologist told Llewellyn that if costly malaria-prevention measures were to stop, it would take only 100 days for the disease-causing mosquito population— and, consequently, the malaria situation— to reach pre-intervention levels.

    Llewellyn, a retired Foreign Service Health Officer with the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), spoke on the agency’s quest to combat the spread of malaria within Tanzania (including mainland Tanganyika and Zanzibar) through preventive measures and patient education.

    Malaria is a parasitic disease that presents flu-like symptoms. If often kills its victims by “disrupting the blood supply to vital organs,” according to the World Health Organization.

    The talk was presented by the Northwestern University Program of African Studies, GlobeMed and the Center for Global Engagement.

    Noelle Sullivan, a lecturer with Northwestern University’s Global Health Studies Program, initially proposed bringing Llewellyn in to speak due to his extensive experience in the field.

    “He’s been on the frontlines of the very development areas that a lot of people here are interested in,” Sullivan explained. “In the end, development is scientific, political, bureaucratic, difficult, challenging and rewarding.”

    Llewellyn presented USAID’s malaria intervention methods and findings as a plea to an audience of burgeoning public health movers and shakers to pick up where he left off.

    USAID developed its malaria prevention game plan through epidemiological work in Zanzibar, islands off the coast of the Tanzanian mainland, since its smaller population made it an ideal study setting, Llewellyn said.

    Within Zanzibar, he said, USAID utilized a three-pronged plan of attack to combat malaria: against disease-carrying mosquitoes, human reinfection of mosquitoes and the Plasmodium falciparum parasite that causes malaria.

    Parasite-carrying mosquitoes were targeted through Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) of insecticides that, once dry, pose no health risk to humans. Llewellyn also said that larvicides target specific insect larvae without harming humans or other wildlife.

    Llewellyn explained that Anopheles mosquitoes are the only type that can only pick up and transmit malaria after biting human parasite carriers. To limit the spread, USAID distributed insecticide-treated nets (ITN). These bed nets simultaneously create a physical barrier from bites and kill insects on contact.

    Finally, he said the parasite was targeted by using Artemisinin combinaton therapy, or a two-medication therapy that uses artemisinin, a wormwood derivative used by ancient Chinese medical practitioners to treat fevers. A secondary anti-malarial medication boosts prevention and makes it harder for the malaria parasite to develop drug resistance.

    According to Llewellyn, the primary challenges to widespread success are patient education, poverty and politics.

    He told the story of people in Ghana, who deal with extreme heat by sleeping on the roofs of their homes instead of in their net-protected beds, heat relief that makes them vulnerable to mosquito bites. That was one example of hurdles faced by people living in poverty.

    The political issues, he said, stem from money.

    “Once kids stop dying, the money’s going to go away,” Llewellyn said, explaining the vicious cycle. And that means the deaths will return.

    Llewellyn expressed hope that a malaria vaccine— the best hope for a permanent solution— would be developed. Previous promises of inoculation have failed to solidify.

    “I don’t think we’ve quite figured it out yet,” he said in a post-event interview.  “I think that until that’s done, malaria will be with us.”

    Despite these difficulties, Llewellyn’s optimism won’t falter.

    “This is a war against malaria,” said Llewellyn. “Everything’s fair in love and war.”

     

     

    USAID Malaria Initiative Results, 2007-2009

    (GRAPHIC CREDIT:Jennifer-Leigh Oprihory & Corinne Chin/MEDILL)

     

  4. New Northwestern Institute for Public Health and Medicine (IPHAM) plans to double research activity of medical school

    July 25, 2012 by Janka Pieper

    Interview with Rowland W Chang, MD/MPH

    Dr Rowland Chang - Photo Courtesy of Feinberg School of Medicine

    Rowland W Chang, MD/MPH
    Senior Associate Dean for Public Health
    Director, Institute for Public Health and Medicine (IPHAM)
    Professor in Preventive Medicine and Medicine-Rheumatology
    Feinberg School of Medicine


    Q: What is the new Institute for Public Health and Medicine (IPHAM)?

    A: The new Institute is a collaboration of nine centers, five of which are based on existing entities and four of which are brand new. The Center for Healthcare Studies; the Buehler Center on Aging, Health, and Society; the Center for Global Health; the Center for Population Health Sciences (born out of Preventive Medicine); and the Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes (born out of Medical Social Sciences), are all existing centers and are being integrated into IPHAM now. New centers include the Center for Community Health, the Center for Behavior and Health, the Center for Engineering and Health, and the Center for Education in Public Health, which will coordinate the existing Master’s programs and also offer a new Health Sciences integrated PhD program starting this September.

    While some of the centers are new, all of the work that will be coordinated by each Center already exists in some form within the medical school. The Institute is re-organizing the work so that it is structured around themes and reduces redundancy, while promoting collaboration. The basic goal of the institute is to help double the research activity of the medical school. It is the dry lab approach to increasing the research we are doing in fields such as epidemiology, bioinformatics, biostatistics, health services research, outcomes research, community health research, and research in international settings, where we would like to become more prominent.

    Q: The IPHAM website states that the Institute’s ultimate goal is to “accelerate innovation at the interface of medicine and public health and achieve measurable improvements in health for patients and populations.” What does the interface of public health and medicine mean exactly?

    A: A lot of solutions to our community’s health care problems require that we are better at delivering healthcare when patients come to their doctor and are admitted to the hospital. We want to improve our physicians and our hospital systems, which will not only help the individual but also affect larger groups of people. At the same time it will help to incorporate the more traditional public health community health matters.

    Take smoking for example: there is an intersection between physicians treating a nicotine addition, public health campaigns discouraging people from starting to smoke, and policy changes on public smoking. Attacking the issue from multiple angles has made a great difference in reducing the smoking rates in this country

    We need to think of this kind of approach, clinic- as well as community-based, as a comprehensive means of strategy toward reducing healthcare costs by helping to prevent diseases that lead to high costs. Clearly, the work needs to be done on both sides: on the prevention side and on the healthcare side, and then also include the policy level. We need to look at these solutions in an integrated fashion, as opposed to having isolated sets of people working in silos that do not interface with each other.

    Q: How will the Institute facilitate interdisciplinary and cross-campus research and communication?

    A: The Institute will make it easier for other faculty, programs, departments, and schools to effectively interact with the medical school. We are interested in looking at broad topics such as health economics and health policy, so there is a lot of potential and interest in bringing together folks from, for example, Kellogg or economics from the Evanston campus. We plan to reach out and attract collaborators; the fact that McCormick’s Sanjay Mehrotra is the Director of the Center for Engineering and Health of the Institute shows that we are already working across schools, and will even further assist us in obtaining these desired cross-school, interdisciplinary partnerships.

    I, personally, have spent a lot of time encouraging collaboration and connecting people. I want to cross boundaries; my own work crosses at least four of these Centers. My research is out of the Center for Population Health Sciences, but it also involves behaviorally issues, and is done in the community. And I teach in the MPH program which is part of the Center for Education in Public Health. I am a strong example of what we are trying to achieve: people who are trying to find solutions to problems by involving a lot of other people.

    IPHAM Homepage

    Q: How does global health fit into the Institute?

    A: The Center for Global Health is a founding center of the Institute, but we are finding that there are international activities occurring in other centers of which the Center for Global Health had not been aware. Our expectation is that this collaboration will benefit all of the participating Centers by providing a platform for researchers to learning what is happening at Centers across the Institute. There are a lot of researchers and clinicians interested in global health, and expanding the participation in these international activities is essential for putting forward successful grant proposals.

    Q: This sounds like a big undertaking and certainly took years of planning, right?

    A: We have been discussing how to make public health a larger focus of the medical school, which culminated with a proposal to change the name to “School of Medicine and Public Health” two years ago. It started with the University’s strategic planning process. Though the proposal we submitted did not pass, it got the attention of the President, Provost, and Dean of the Medical School. We kept working at it. One of the first things Dean Eric G. Neilson did when he became the new Dean of the medical school last fall was to convene a group of leaders to create the new Institute. And we have been working on it ever since.

    Q: That’s an impressive quick turnaround. Finally, is there an official launch date?

    A: There will be an official launch date sometime in September. We have full commitments from all participating Centers, Directors and associated faculty. We will announce new faculty opportunities and make a national splash in the fall.

  5. Oncofertility: A global perspective

    March 22, 2012 by Christi Sodano

    No longer just an old person’s disease, cancer among young people is increasingly prevalent. And while the growing field of oncofertility is gaining steam here in the U.S., more education and coordinated efforts are required to provide global awareness of the issues that young cancer patients face.

    One of the main problems patients around the world often encounter is the lack of education or awareness among oncologists about new treatments and possibilities in the world of oncofertility.

    Doctors are often concerned that delaying cancer treatment for fertility preservation procedures will harm the patient, said Dr. Melissa Hudson, director of the Cancer Survivorship division at St. Jude Children’s research hospital.

    “Our perception as oncologists is that almost all options are still investigational. Because of this, fertility preservation is not really a priority. Those feelings can be easily transmitted to the patient,” she said.

    However, she notes that especially in the cases of children with less aggressive cancers, a brief delay could be okay. It may only take a few days to harvest ovarian tissue that could enable an otherwise sterile young girl to have children later in life, something that is not widely accepted.

    While physician education is ideal, patient awareness could ultimately solve this problem.

    Many times patients go to their doctors after reading something in the media regarding oncofertility and that is how they learn about treatment options, said Johan Smitz, a fertility specialist and laboratory head at UZ Brussels.

    “It all starts by educating the profession about the huge growth reproductive medicine has had over the last 30 years,” Smitz said.

    Doctors now routinely take ovarian tissue samples and oocytes and freeze them as a method of preserving fertility. “I think it is now 17 live-births resulting from tissue culture,” said Prof. Teresa Woodruff, Ph.D., of Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine and  founder of the Oncofertility Consortium.

    But awareness alone will not be enough to overcome the international barriers facing oncofertility. Coordinating national efforts is key in addressing this problem, Smitz said.

    “There are approximately 1.4 million people in the world that will have a fertility threatening treatment. And globally, everyone needs to be aware that fertility preservation is a problem,” Woodruff said.

    In some European countries, funding is largely dependent on publishing papers that impact the field of research.

    “[In Belgium], the government provides funding for four years and they expect to see a lot of output from that, but the problem is, putting gonadal tissue in culture requires long-term research because it can take months to grow one mature, human oocyte,” Smitz said.

    In an effort to address this issue and better coordinate research efforts, the European Society for Human Reproductive Embryology partnered with America’s Oncofertility Consortium to share information across borders.

    Despite these efforts, one thing is clear, more research and awareness are required before fertility preservation becomes a mainstream global effort for cancer patients.

     

     

     

     

     

     

Page 1 of 41234